Free 365 Days Exam Updates FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 dumps with test Engine Practice [Q60-Q77]

April 13, 2026 admin 0

Categories : FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 , Fortinet

4/5 - (2 votes)

Free 365 Days Exam Updates FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 dumps with test Engine Practice

Updated Verified FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 dumps Q&As – 100% Pass Guaranteed

NO.60 Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a session. Which two statements are true? (Choose Iwo.)

The TCP session has been successfully established.

The session was initiated from an authenticated user.

The session is being inspected using flow inspection.

The session is being offloaded.

NO.61 Which statement aboutprotocol options is true?

Protocol options allow administrators to configure a maximum number of sessions for each configured protocol.

Protocol options give administrators a streamlined method to instruct FortiGate to block all sessions corresponding to disabled protocols.

Protocol options allow administrators to configure the Any setting for all enabled protocols, which provides the most efficient use of system resources.

Protocol options allow administrators to configure which Layer 4 port numbers map to upper-layer protocols, such as HTTP, SMTP, FTP, and so on.

NO.62 In an FSSO environment, a user is listed as active on FortiGate but cannot browse the internet.
Which factor do you not need to verify as a potential problem?

The connectivity between the collector agent and FortiGate

Whether there is a valid firewall policy

The user’s group information

That the user’s IP address is in the list of active FSSO users

NO.63 Refer to the exhibit, which contains partial output from an IKE real-time debug. Which two statements about this debug output are correct? (Choose two.)

Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) is enabled in the configuration.

The local gateway IP address is 10.0.0.1.

It shows a phase 2 negotiation.

The initiator provided remote as its IPsec peer ID.

NO.64 Refer to the exhibit, which shows a session entry.

Which statement about this session is true?

Return traffic to the initiator is sent to 10.1.0.1.

Return traffic to the initiator is sent lo 10.200.1.254.

It is an ICMP session from 10.1.10.10 to 10.200.1.1.

It is an ICMP session from 10.1.10.1 to 10.200.5.1.

Return packet routing back to the source follows this format gwy=10.200.1.254 (this is the gateway to the dest) / 10.1.0.1 (this is the destination’s gateway back to the source).

NO.65 Refer to the exhibit, which contains the output of diagnose vpn tunnel list.

Which command will capture ESP traffic for the VPN named DialUp_0?

diagnose sniffer packet any ‘ip proto 50’

diagnose sniffer packet any ‘host 10.0.10.10’

diagnose sniffer packet any ‘esp and host 10.200.3.2’

diagnose sniffer packet any ‘port 4500’

NO.66 What are two reasons you might see iprope_in_check() check failed, drop when using the debug flow?
(Choose two.)

Packet was dropped because of policy route misconfiguration.

Packet was dropped because of traffic shaping.

Trusted host list misconfiguration.

VIP or IP pool misconfiguration.

NO.67 Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a BGP debug command.

What is the reason that the local FortiGate is not receiving any prefixes from its neighbors?

The RIB-OUT configuration for router 10.127.0.75prevents any route advertisement to the local router.

The router 100.64.3.1needs to update the local AS number to 65060to become adjacent with the local router.

The local router is waiting for the keepalive message from the router 10.125.0.60.

None of the three neighbors have successfully established the TCP three-way handshake with the local router.

Since none of the peers are in the Established state (two remain in Active/OpenSent and the one
“0” in the PfxRcd column actually indicates no adjacency), there is no session over which to receive any routes.

NO.68 Refer to the exhibits.

An administrator Is expecting to receive advertised route 8.8.8.8/32 from FGT-A. On FGT-B, they confirm that the route is being advertised and received, however, the route is not being injected into the routing table.
What is the most likely cause of this issue?

A batter route to the 8.8.8.8/32 network exists in the routing table.

FGT-B is configured with a prefix list denying the 8.8.8.8/32 network to be injected into the routing table.

The administrator has misconfigured redistribution of routes on FGT-A.

FGT-8 is configured with a distribution list denying the 8.8.8.8/32 network to be injected into the routing table.

NO.69 Refer to the exhibits. An administrator is attempting to advertise the network configured on port3.
However, FGT-A is not receiving the prefix.
Which two actions can the administrator take to fix this problem? (Choose two.)

Modify the prefix using the network command from 172.16.0.0/16 to 172.16.54.0/24.

Manually add the BGP route on FGT-A.

Restart BGP using a soft reset to force both peers to exchange their complete BGP routing tables.

Use the set network-import-check disable command.

BGP’s network statement only advertises prefixes that exactly match routes in the RIB by default.
Since port3 is 172.16.54.0/24, changing the prefix to 172.16.54.0/24 ensures it’s in the routing table and will be advertised.
You can disable the network import check global (or per prefix) setting so FortiGate will advertise the 172.16.0.0/16 prefix even though no matching route exists in the RIB.

NO.70 What are two reasons you might see iprope_in_check() check failed, drop when using the debug flow? (Choose two.)

Packet was dropped because of policy route misconfiguration.

Packet was dropped because of traffic shaping.

Trusted host list misconfiguration.

VIP or IP pool misconfiguration.

NO.71 Refer to the exhibit, which contains partial output from an IKE real-time debug.

The administrator does not have access to the remote gateway. Based on the debug output, which configuration change the administrator make to the local gateway to resolve the phase 1 negotiation error?

In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AES256-SHA256 to the list of encryption algorithms.

In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AESCBC-SHA2 to the list of encryption algorithms.

In the phase 1 network configuration, set the IKE version to 2.

In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AES128-SHA128 to the list of encryption algorithms.

Add an AES256 SHA256 proposal to your local Phase 1 settings so that the FortiGate can match the peer’s AES CBC/256 with SHA 256 proposal.

NO.72 Which three common FortiGate-to-collector-agent connectivity issues can you identify using the FSSO real-time debug? (Choose three.)

Log is full on the collector agent.

Inability to reach IP address of the collector agent.

Refused connection. Potential mismatch of TCP port.

Mismatched pre-shared password.

Incompatible collector agent software version.

NO.73 Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit, which contains a screenshot of some phase 1 settings.
The VPN is not up. To diagnose the issue, the administrator enters the following CLI commands on an SSH session on FortiGate:

However, the IKE real-time debug does not show any output. Why?

The administrator must also run the command diagnose debug enable.

The debug shows only error messages. If there is no output, then the phase 1 and phase 2 configurations match.

The log-filter setting is incorrect. The VPN traffic does not match this filter.

Replace diagnose debug application ike -1 with diagnose debug application ipsec -1.

NO.74 Which statement about parallel path processing is correct (PPP)?

PPP chooses froma group of parallel options lo identity the optimal path tor processing a packet.

Only FortiGate hardware configurations affect the path that a packet takes.

PPP does not apply to packets that are part of an already established session.

Software configuration has no impact on PPP.

NO.75 Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of diagnose sys session list.

If the HA ID for the primary device is 0, what happens if the primary fails and the secondary becomes the primary?

The secondary device has this session synchronized; however, because application control is applied, the session is marked dirty and has to be re-evaluated after failover.

Traffic for this session continues to be permitted on the new primary device after failover, without requiring the client to restart the session with the server.

The session will be removed from the session table of the secondary device because of the presence of allowed error packets, which will force the client to restart the session with the server.

The session state is preserved but the kernel will need to re-evaluate the session because NAT was applied.

NO.76 Consider the scenario where the server name indication (SNI) does not match either the common name (CN) or any of the subject alternative names (SAN) in the server certificate.
Which action will FortiGate take when using the default settings for SSL certificate inspection?

FortiGate uses the SNI from the user’s web browser.

FortiGate closes the connection because this represents an invalid SSL/TLS configuration.

FortiGate uses the first entry listed in the SAN field in the server certificate.

FortiGate uses the ZN information from the Subject field in the server certificate.

NO.77 Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a debug command.

What needs to happen for the local router to be elected DR?

The local router will be elected DR only if re-election occurs and its router ID is highest, assuming equal priority.

The local router will be elected DR if the current DR fails because it has a higher router ID than the BDR.

The local router will never be elected DR.

Both the DR and BDR will have to fail before the local router will be elected DR.

On a broadcast network the BDR automatically takes over if the DR dies; only when there is no BDR (or it fails as well) will a new full DR election occur, at which point this router – having the highest router ID among the remaining routers – would win.

Loading …

Provide Valid Dumps To Help You Prepare For FCSS – Network Security 7.4 Support Engineer Exam: https://www.vceprep.com/FCSS_NST_SE-7.4-latest-vce-prep.html